Ideas from the thirteen weeks of MOOC

One recurring theme of the thirteen weeks of MOOC sessions has been that the current education system is  no longer appropriate for learners in the 21st century. Many of the MOOC presentations in the past 13 weeks point to this problem from various angles – formal learning, informal learning or somewhere in between. The following image illustrates the ideas slowing coming together in my mind.

In terms of formal learning, Tony Bates believes that changes can occur within the existing education institutes; and the introduction of technology-enhanced learning requires educators to get rid of the prejudice against online learning and university professors to let go of, what Bates called, the Socratic myth, which is the idea of teachers and learners having dialogues as interlocutors in Plato’s book, which no longer holds true in the lecture halls of 21st century mega universities. Zoraini Wati Abas, for instance, shows us how mobile learning can be used as a support system, providing timely and incremental learning and motivational support for learners.

Looking at the formal learning from another angle, Martin Weller points to the importance of academic institutes recognizing digital scholarship, moving away from the inefficient and costly publishing model and moving towards online publications that better promotes interdisciplinary endeavours.

From yet another angle, David Wiley and Rory McGreal urge universities to open their content; Wiley further envisions the future of education consisting of learner-generated materials; professors’ notes on a website would become obsolete.

On the informal learning side, there is Clark Quinn’s idea of slow learning, contending that the current education system takes learning out of the context of our everyday life, putting that in an institute, often requiring learning to memorize a great of information. This does not match the way our brain process information, as we are better at learning incremental chunks of knowledge in a meaningful and authentic context.

Dave Cormier stresses the role of lifelong learning in 21st century workplace. Building rhizome-like learning networks can foster an environment more conducive to continuous knowledge acquisition and construction, resulting in modern employees being more competent in adapting to the changing environment of the 21st century workplace, doing away with employee training and costly consultation.

Finally, in the discussion of technology-enhanced learning, it is important to consider the tools. Here Jon Dron reminds us that tools themselves are not technology. Dron’s definitions of hard vs soft technologies relevant to both formal and informal learning, further help us to undertand that soft technologies are perhaps more useful in building learning and support communities and equipping learners with the ability to  navigate information in networks, thereby promoting lifelong learning.


11 thoughts on “Ideas from the thirteen weeks of MOOC

  1. I like this overview very much. I have been working with the advantages of the MOOC´s and I therefore like that you are connecting the theory of Dave Cormier with knowledge acquisition/construction. I think that your point of using learning in networks as means to lifelong learning is here crucial. But the question is now – how to we get the time to learn in networks?

  2. Thanks for compiling this. Seeing the contributers together allows me to draw connections between them. Rather than viewing as a series of interesting but isolated events, the “weeks” are begining to self-assemble into a wholeness. (For me anyway).

    Interesting perceptual jump induced by simply grouping? Selective grouping seems like something I encountered all through school but always seemed to be made from the crappy kind of snow that wouldn’t form a snowball you could throw at someone. Maybe the instructors weren’t the right formula to create a stickiness between the things we studied?


  3. Thank you for summarizing the course and tying together the various topics. As a general theme, I agree that this course is mostly about student-centered, student-driven work. While many of the presenters have riffed on the same theme from different perspectives, this all seems to come down to adapting, transforming, crafting the educational experience to meet the current and future needs of our learners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s